The types of diabetes mellitus in children are similar to those in adults, but psychosocial problems are different and can complicate treatment.
Type 1 diabetes is the most common type in children, accounting for two thirds of new cases in children of all racial and ethnic groups. It is one of the most common chronic childhood diseases, occurring in 1 in 300 children by age 18 (1).
Although type 1 can occur at any age, it is typically diagnosed between age 4 years and 6 years or between age 10 years and 14 years. The incidence has been increasing worldwide at a rate of 2 to 5%. Despite prior reported increases in children < age 5 years (2), this trend in this age group has not continued, and greater increases in children ages 10 to 19 years have been noted (3, 4).
Type 2 diabetes, once rare in children, has been increasing in frequency in parallel with the increase in childhood obesity (see obesity in children).
Type 2 is typically diagnosed after puberty, with the highest rate between 15 years and 19 years of age (see obesity in adolescents) (5).
Approximately 80% of children with type 2 diabetes have obesity (6). However, there is considerable heterogeneity, and the relationship between obesity and age at onset of type 2 diabetes is less clear in some ethnicities (eg, South Asian children) (7).
Monogenic forms of diabetes, previously termed maturity-onset diabetes of youth (MODY), are not considered type 1 or type 2 (although they are sometimes mistaken for them) and are uncommon (1 to 4% of cases).
Prediabetes is impaired glucose regulation resulting in intermediate glucose levels that are too high to be normal but do not meet criteria for diabetes. In adolescents with obesity, prediabetes may be transient (with reversion to normal in 2 years in 60%) or progress to diabetes, especially in adolescents who persistently gain weight.
Prediabetes is associated with the metabolic syndrome (impaired glucose regulation, dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity).
Most patients are categorized as having type 1 or type 2 diabetes, and this distinction is used to guide treatment. Classification is based on clinical history (age, family history, body habitus), presentation, and laboratory studies, including antibodies. However, this classification system does not fully capture the clinical heterogeneity of patients, and some patients cannot clearly be classified as having type 1 or type 2 diabetes at diagnosis. In both types 1 and 2, genetic and environmental factors can result in the progressive loss of beta-cell function that results in hyperglycemia.
In type 1 diabetes, the pancreas produces little to no insulin because of autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta-cells, possibly triggered by an environmental exposure in genetically susceptible people. Inherited susceptibility to type 1 diabetes is determined by multiple genes (> 60 risk loci have been identified). Susceptibility genes are more common among some populations and explain the higher prevalence of type 1 diabetes in certain ethnic groups (eg, Scandinavians, Sardinians).
About 85% of people newly diagnosed with type 1 do not have a family history of type 1 diabetes. However, close relatives of people who have type 1 diabetes are at increased risk of diabetes (about 15 times the risk of the general population), with overall incidence 6% in siblings (> 50% in monozygotic twins) (1). The risk of diabetes for a child who has a parent with type 1 diabetes is about 3.6 to 8.5% if the father is affected and is about 1.3 to 3.6% if the mother is affected (2). Risk screening is available for relatives of people who have type 1 diabetes in an effort to identify the early stages of type 1 diabetes before symptoms occur.
Children with type 1 diabetes are at higher risk of other autoimmune disorders, particularly thyroid disease and celiac disease.
In type 2 diabetes, the pancreas produces insulin, but there are varying degrees of insulin resistance, and insulin secretion is inadequate to meet the increased demand caused by insulin resistance (ie, there is relative insulin deficiency).
Onset of type 2 diabetes often coincides with the peak of physiologic pubertal insulin resistance, which may lead to symptoms of hyperglycemia in previously compensated adolescents.
The cause of type 2 diabetes is not autoimmune destruction of beta-cells but rather a complex interaction between many genes and environmental factors, which differ among different populations and patients.
Type 2 diabetes in children is different than type 2 diabetes in adults (3). In children, decline in beta-cell function and development of diabetes-related complications are accelerated.
Risk factors for type 2 diabetes include
Obesity
Native American, Black, Hispanic, Asian American, and Pacific Islander heritage
Family history (60 to 90% have a first- or second-degree relative with type 2 diabetes)
Maternal history of type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes during pregnancy
Current use of atypical antipsychotic medications
Monogenic forms of diabetes are caused by genetic defects that are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, so patients typically have one or more affected family members. Unlike types 1 and 2, there is no autoimmune destruction of beta-cells or insulin resistance. Onset is usually before age 25 years.
In type 1 diabetes, lack of insulin causes hyperglycemia and impaired glucose utilization in skeletal muscle. Muscle and fat are then broken down to provide energy. Fat breakdown produces ketones, which cause acidemia and sometimes a significant, life-threatening acidosis (diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA]).
In type 2 diabetes, there is usually enough insulin function to prevent DKA at diagnosis, but children can sometimes present with DKA (up to 25%) or, less commonly, hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (HHS), also referred to as hyperosmolar hyperglycemic nonketotic syndrome (HHNK), in which severe hyperosmolar dehydration occurs. HHS most often occurs during a period of stress or infection, with nonadherence to treatment regimens, or when glucose metabolism is further impaired by medications (eg, corticosteroids). Other metabolic derangements associated with insulin resistance can be present at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and include
Dyslipidemia (leading to atherosclerosis)
Hypertension
Polycystic ovary syndrome
Obstructive sleep apnea
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (fatty liver)
Atherosclerosis begins in childhood or adolescence and markedly increases risk of cardiovascular disease.
In monogenic forms of diabetes, the underlying defect depends on the type. The most common types are caused by defects in transcription factors that regulate pancreatic beta-cell function (eg, hepatic nuclear factor 4-alpha [HNF-4-α], hepatic nuclear factor 1-alpha [HNF-1-α]). In these types, insulin secretion is impaired but not absent, there is no insulin resistance, and hyperglycemia worsens with age. Another type of monogenic diabetes is caused by a defect in the glucose sensor, glucokinase. With glucokinase defects, insulin secretion is normal but glucose levels are regulated at a higher set point, causing fasting hyperglycemia that worsens minimally with age.
In type 1 diabetes, initial manifestations vary from asymptomatic hyperglycemia to life-threatening DKA. Most commonly, children present with symptomatic hyperglycemia without acidosis, with several days to weeks of urinary frequency, polydipsia, and polyuria. Polyuria may manifest as nocturia, enuresis (bed-wetting), or diurnal incontinence; in children who are not toilet-trained, parents may note an increased frequency of wet or heavy diapers.
About half of children have weight loss as a result of increased catabolism and also have impaired growth.
Fatigue, weakness, candidal rashes, blurry vision (due to the hyperosmolar state of the lens and vitreous humor), and/or nausea and vomiting (due to ketonemia) may also be present initially.
In type 2 diabetes, the clinical presentation varies widely. Children are often asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic, and their condition may be detected only on routine testing. However, some children have a severe manifestation of symptomatic hyperglycemia, hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state or DKA.
Fasting plasma glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL (≥ 7.0 mmol/L)
Random glucose level ≥ 200 mg/dL ( ≥ 11.1 mmol/L)
Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) ≥ 6.5% (≥ 48 mmol/mol)
Sometimes oral glucose tolerance testing
Determination of diabetes type (eg, type 1, type 2, monogenic)
Diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes is similar to that in adults, typically using fasting or random plasma glucose levels and/or HbA1C levels, and depends on the presence or absence of symptoms.
Diabetes is diagnosed in patients with characteristic symptoms of diabetes and blood glucose measurements that meet either of the following criteria (1, 2):
Random plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL (≥ 11.1 mmol/L)
Fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL (≥ 7.0 mmol/L); fasting is defined as no caloric intake for 8 hours
An oral glucose tolerance test is not required and should not be done if diabetes can be diagnosed by other criteria. When needed, the test should be done using 1.75 g/kg (maximum 75 g) glucose dissolved in water; a positive result is a 2-hour plasma glucose level ≥ 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L). The test may be helpful in children without symptoms or with mild or atypical symptoms and may be helpful in suspected cases of type 2 or monogenic diabetes.
The HbA1C criterion is typically more useful for diagnosing type 2 diabetes, and hyperglycemia should be confirmed with a fasting or random plasma glucose. Although the HbA1C screening test is commonly used and recommended for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in children (3), the results of the test should be interpreted with caution in some patients. For example, in children with cystic fibrosis, HbA1C is not a recommended screening test, and the diagnosis of diabetes in these children should be based on blood glucose levels. In children with conditions causing abnormal red blood cell turnover, such as hemoglobinopathies (eg, sickle cell disease), alternative measurements (eg, fructosamine) should be considered in addition to review of blood glucose levels.
For patients who are suspected of having diabetes but who do not appear ill, initial testing to establish the diagnosis should include a basic metabolic panel, including electrolytes and glucose, and urinalysis.
For patients who are suspected of having diabetes and who are ill, testing also includes a venous or arterial blood gas, liver tests, and calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and hematocrit levels.
Additional tests should be done to differentiate between types 1 and 2 diabetes (or other types), including
C-peptide and insulin (if not yet treated with insulin) levels
Tests for autoantibodies against pancreatic islet cell proteins
Autoantibodies include glutamic acid decarboxylase, insulin, insulinoma-associated protein, and zinc transporter ZnT8. More than 90% of patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes have ≥ 1 of these autoantibodies, whereas the absence of antibodies strongly suggests type 2 diabetes. However, about 10 to 20% of children with the type 2 diabetes phenotype have autoantibodies and are reclassified as type 1 diabetes, because such children are more likely to have a rapid progression to insulin therapy (4) and are at greater risk of developing other autoimmune disorders (4, 5, 6).
Type 1 diabetes progresses in distinct stages that are characterized by the presence of ≥ 2 islet autoantibodies. Stage is associated with risk of disease progression. For example, risk of progression to stage 3 by stage at diagnosis includes stage 1 (44% 5-year risk and an 80 to 90% 15-year risk) and stage 2 (75% 5-year risk and a 100% lifetime risk) (7). By contrast, children with a single islet autoantibody have 15% risk of progression within 10 years (8).
Monogenic diabetes is important to recognize because treatment differs from type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The diagnosis should be considered in children with a strong family history of diabetes but who lack typical features of type 2 diabetes; that is, they have only mild fasting (100 to 150 mg/dL [5.55 to 8.32 mmol/L]) or postprandial hyperglycemia, are young and do not have obesity, and have no autoantibodies or signs of insulin resistance. Genetic testing is available to confirm monogenic diabetes. This testing is important because some types of monogenic diabetes can progress with age.
Patients with type 2 diabetes should have liver function tests, fasting lipid profile, and urine microalbumin:creatinine ratio done at the time of diagnosis because such children (unlike those with type 1 diabetes, in whom complications develop over many years) often have comorbidities at diagnosis, such as fatty liver, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Children with clinical findings suggestive of complications should also be tested:
Obesity: Test for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
Daytime somnolence or snoring while sleeping: Test for obstructive sleep apnea
Hirsutism, acne, or menstrual irregularities: Test for polycystic ovary syndrome
Patients with type 1 diabetes should be tested at or near the time of diagnosis for other autoimmune diseases by measuring celiac disease antibodies and thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroxine, and thyroid antibodies.
Testing for thyroid disease (if thyroid antibodies are negative) and celiac disease should occur every 1 to 2 years thereafter. Testing for thyroid disease should be more frequent if symptoms develop or if thyroid antibodies are positive.
Other autoimmune disorders, such as primary adrenal insufficiency (Addison disease), rheumatologic disease (eg, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis), other gastrointestinal disorders (eg, inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune hepatitis), and skin disease (eg, vitiligo), may also occur in children with type 1 diabetes but do not require routine screening (9).
Healthy food choices and exercise
For type 1 diabetes, insulin
For type 2 diabetes, metformin and sometimes insulin or GLP-1 agonists
Intensive education and treatment in childhood and adolescence may help achieve treatment goals, which are to normalize blood glucose levels while minimizing the number of hypoglycemic episodes and to prevent or delay the onset and progression of complications.
Lifestyle modifications that benefit all patients include
Eating regularly and in consistent amounts
Limiting intake of refined carbohydrates and saturated fats
Increasing physical activity
In general, the term diet should be avoided in favor of meal plan or healthy food choices. The main focus is on encouraging children to eat heart-healthy meals that are low in cholesterol and saturated fats and that are suitable for all young people and their families. The goal is to improve diabetes outcomes and reduce cardiovascular risk. Clinicians should work with children with diabetes and their caregivers to create an individualized meal plan (1). To improve glycemic outcomes, patients treated with insulin should be taught to how to make prandial insulin adjustments. Setting up routines at mealtimes is also important to achieve glycemic targets.
In spite of advances in diabetes technology that have improved quality of care and glycemic control, not all patients have benefited. In the United States, children who are White or non-Hispanic have a lower rate of complications and adverse outcomes caused by poor glycemic control. Race, ethnicity, and social determinants of health (eg, socioeconomic status, neighborhood and physical environment, food environment, health care access, social context) are associated with the ability to maintain optimal glycemic control in children with diabetes (2, 3).
Routine monitoring involves 1 or more of the following:
Multiple daily glucose checks by fingerstick
Continuous glucose monitoring
HbA1C measurements every 3 months
Self-monitoring of blood glucose involves intermittent fingersticks to test capillary blood glucose using a glucose monitor (glucometer).
Self-monitoring is the traditional approach. Glucose levels are checked before all meals, before a bedtime snack, and if children have symptoms of hypoglycemia. Levels also should be checked during the night (around 2 to 3 AM) if nocturnal hypoglycemia is a concern (eg, because of hypoglycemia or vigorous exercise during the day, or when an insulin dose is increased).
Temporary adjustments are made if changes in glucose regulation are anticipated because of exercise or illness. Because exercise can lower glucose levels for up to 24 hours after activity, levels should be checked more frequently on days when children exercise or are more active. To prevent hypoglycemia, children may increase carbohydrate intake or lower insulin dosing when they anticipate increased activity. Sick-day management (measuring ketones and giving additional fluid and insulin if needed) should be used with hyperglycemia or illness.
Parents should use a journal, app, spreadsheet, smart meter, or cloud-based program to keep detailed daily records of all factors that can affect glycemic control, including blood glucose levels, timing and amount of insulin doses, carbohydrate intake, physical activity, and any other relevant factors (eg, illness, late snack, missed insulin dose).
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are a common method of monitoring blood glucose levels and can replace routine self-monitoring of blood glucose for some patients. These systems are increasingly being used in all children, with the highest rates in children < 6 years old.
CGM systems are a more sophisticated and effective approach to monitoring and use a subcutaneous sensor to measure interstitial fluid glucose levels every 1 to 5 minutes and then translate the measurements into blood glucose values, thus more closely detecting glucose fluctuations that can then be acted on in real time. They transmit results wirelessly to a monitoring and display device that may be built into an insulin pump or may be a stand-alone device. By identifying times of consistent hyperglycemia and times of increased risk of hypoglycemia, CGM systems can help patients with type 1 diabetes more safely reach glycemic goals.
Given the significant burdens of monitoring requirements, CGM should be offered if available and if the patient and/or family can use the device safely. Most CGM devices now give real-time feedback about current glucose readings and trends with alarms for high and low thresholds and can replace self-monitoring of blood glucose. Compared to intermittent fingerstick monitoring, CGM systems can help lower HbA1C levels, increase the percentage of time-in-range, and lower the risk of hypoglycemia (4).
Children using a CGM device need to be able to measure blood glucose by fingerstick to calibrate their monitor and/or to verify readings if they are discordant from symptoms, but, after a brief warm-up period (1 to 2 hours), newer systems do not require regular calibration with fingerstick.
Two types of CGM systems are currently available for daily home use: real-time CGM and intermittently scanned CGM.
Real-time CGM can be used in children ≥ 2 years of age. The system automatically transmits a continuous stream of glucose data to the user in real time, provides alerts and active alarms, and also transmits glucose data to a receiver, smartwatch, or smartphone. Real-time CGM should be used as close to daily as possible for maximal benefit.
Intermittently scanned CGM can be used in children ≥ 4 years of age. It provides the same type of glucose data as real-time CGM but requires the user to purposely scan the sensor with a reader or enabled smartphone to obtain information. Similar to real-time CGM, glucose data can be transferred remotely for review by parents or health care professionals. Newer intermittently scanned CGM systems have optional alerts and alarms. Intermittently scanned CGM should be used frequently, a minimum of once every 8 hours. Children who use a CGM device need to be able to measure blood glucose with a fingerstick to calibrate their monitor and to verify glucose readings if they do not match their symptoms.
Although CGM devices can be used with any regimen, they are typically worn by insulin pump users. When used in conjunction with an insulin pump, the combination is known as sensor-augmented pump therapy. This therapy requires manual adjustment of insulin doses based on CGM results.
Other CGM systems are integrated with a pump and can also suspend the basal rate for up to 2 hours when glucose levels drop below a set threshold (low glucose suspend system) or when they are predicted to drop below a set threshold (predictive low glucose suspend system). This integration can reduce the number of hypoglycemic events, even when compared to sensor-augmented pump therapy.
Closed-loop insulin pumps can be used in children ≥ 2 years of age. These hybrid closed-loop systems automate blood glucose management through sophisticated computer algorithms that are on a smartphone or similar device and link a CGM sensor to an insulin pump to determine blood glucose levels and control insulin delivery. Delivery is controlled by suspending, increasing, or decreasing basal insulin in response to CGM values. Newer hybrid closed-loop systems allow for greater automation but do not require input for mealtime boluses by the user. These systems help more tightly control insulin dosing, limit hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic episodes, and have optional settings for sleep and exercise. A fully automated closed-loop system, sometimes known as a bihormonal (insulin and glucagon) artificial pancreas, continues to be evaluated but is not commercially available.
Asymptomatic children ≤ 18 years of age who are at risk should be screened for type 2 diabetes or prediabetes by measuring HbA1C. This test should first be done at age 10 years or at onset of puberty, if puberty occurred at a younger age, and should be repeated at a minimum every 3 years. Annual screening may be necessary in a child whose BMI has increased or whose cardiometabolic profile has worsened, who has strong family history of type 2 diabetes, or who has evidence of prediabetes (1).
Children at risk include those with overweight (body mass index > 85th percentile for age and sex, or weight for height > 85th percentile) and who have any 2 of the following:
Family history of type 2 diabetes in a first- or second-degree relative
Native American, Black, Hispanic, Asian American, and Pacific Islander heritage
Signs of insulin resistance or conditions associated with insulin resistance (eg, acanthosis nigricans, hypertension, dyslipidemia, polycystic ovary syndrome, or small-for-gestational-age birth weight)
Maternal history of diabetes or gestational diabetes
1. Maahs DM, West NA, Lawrence JM, Mayer-Davis EJ. Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2010;39(3):481-497. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2010.05.011
2. Patterson CC, Dahlquist GG, Gyürüs E, et al: Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989-2003 and predicted new cases 2005-20: a multicentre prospective registration study. Lancet 373(9680):2027-2033, 2009. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60568-7
3. Lawrence JM, Divers J, Isom S, et al: Trends in Prevalence of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents in the US, 2001-2017 [published correction appears in JAMA 326(13):1331, 2021]. JAMA 326(8):717-727, 2021. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11165
4. Divers J, Mayer-Davis EJ, Lawrence JM, et al: Trends in Incidence of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Among Youths – Selected Counties and Indian Reservations, United States, 2002-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69(6):161-165, 2020. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6906a3
5. Pettitt DJ, Talton J, Dabelea D, et al: Prevalence of diabetes in U.S. youth in 2009: the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study. Diabetes Care 37(2):402-408, 2014. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1838
6. Liu LL, Lawrence JM, Davis C, et al: Prevalence of overweight and obesity in youth with diabetes in USA: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Pediatr Diabetes 11(1):4-11, 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00519.x
7. Shah AS, Zeitler PS, Wong J, et al: ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 23(7):872-902, 2022. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13409
1. Steck AK, Rewers MJ. Genetics of type 1 diabetes. Clin Chem. 2011;57(2):176-185. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2010.148221
2. Libman I, Haynes A, Lyons S, et al: ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 23(8):1160-1174, 2022. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13454
3. Tryggestad JB, Willi SM: Complications and comorbidities of T2DM in adolescents: findings from the TODAY clinical trial. J Diabetes Complications 29(2):307-312, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.10.009
1. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, et al: 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023 [published correction appears in Diabetes Care. 2023 Feb 01] [published correction appears in Diabetes Care. 2023 Sep 1;46(9):1715]. Diabetes Care 46(Suppl 1):S19-S40, 2023. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S002
2. Libman I, Haynes A, Lyons S, et al: ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 23(8):1160-1174, 2022. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13454
3. Wallace AS, Wang D, Shin JI, Selvin E: Screening and Diagnosis of Prediabetes and Diabetes in US Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics 146(3):e20200265, 2020. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0265
4. Turner R, Stratton I, Horton V, et al: UKPDS 25: autoantibodies to islet-cell cytoplasm and glutamic acid decarboxylase for prediction of insulin requirement in type 2 diabetes. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Lancet 350(9087):1288-1293, 1997. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)03062-6
5. Klingensmith GJ, Pyle L, Arslanian S, et al: The presence of GAD and IA-2 antibodies in youth with a type 2 diabetes phenotype: results from the TODAY study. Diabetes Care 33(9):1970-1975, 2010. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0373
6. Shah AS, Zeitler PS, Wong J, et al: ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 23(7):872-902, 2022. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13409
7. Ziegler AG, Rewers M, Simell O, et al: Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children. JAMA 309(23):2473-2479, 2013. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6285
8. Besser REJ, Bell KJ, Couper JJ, et al: ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Stages of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 23(8):1175-1187, 2022. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13410
9. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, et al: 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes–2023. Diabetes Care 46(Suppl 1):S230-S253, 2023. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S014
1. Annan SF, Higgins LA, Jelleryd E, et al: ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Nutritional management in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 23(8):1297-1321, 2022. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13429
2. Kahkoska AR, Pokaprakarn T, Alexander GR, et al: The Impact of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Diabetes Management on Clinical Outcomes: A Reinforcement Learning Analysis of Health Inequity Among Youth and Young Adults in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Diabetes Care 45(1):108-118, 2022. doi: 10.2337/dc21-0496
3. Redondo MJ, Libman I, Cheng P, et al: Racial/Ethnic Minority Youth With Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Have Poor Prognostic Factors. Diabetes Care 41(5):1017-1024, 2018. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2335
4. Tauschmann M, Forlenza G, Hood K, et al: ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes technologies: Glucose monitoring. Pediatr Diabetes 23(8):1390-1405, 2022. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13451
5. Sundberg F, Barnard K, Cato A, et al: ISPAD Guidelines. Managing diabetes in preschool children. Pediatr Diabetes 18(7):499-517, 2017. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12554
6. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, et al: 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care 46(Suppl 1):S230-S253, 2023. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S014
7. de Bock M, Codner E, Craig ME, et al: ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Glycemic targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young people with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 23(8):1270-1276, 2022. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13455
8. Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Cheng P, et al: The relationships between time in range, hyperglycemia metrics, and HbA1c. Diabetes Technol Ther 13(4):614–626, 2019. doi: 10.1177/1932296818822496
9. Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al: Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care 42(8):1593-1603, 2019. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028
10. Herold KC, Bundy BN, Long SA, et al. An Anti-CD3 Antibody, Teplizumab, in Relatives at Risk for Type 1 Diabetes [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):586]. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(7):603-613. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1902226
11. Sims EK, Bundy BN, Stier K, et al. Teplizumab improves and stabilizes beta cell function in antibody-positive high-risk individuals. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(583):eabc8980. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abc8980
12. Copeland KC, Silverstein J, Moore KR, et al: Management of newly diagnosed type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 131(2):364-382, 2013. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3494
13. Shah AS, Zeitler PS, Wong J, et al: ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 23(7):872-902, 2022. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13409
1. Shah AS, Zeitler PS, Wong J, et al: ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 23(7):872-902, 2022. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13409
As children grow into teenagers, their bodies and minds go through many changes. Each stage brings new health needs from nutrition and sleep to emotional well-being and development.
Search on the closest Doctor to your location and book based on specialty. EARN 10 POINTS more with CuraPOINT.
BOOKCurafile is the biggest Healthcare Curated Network Globally that serves citizens, service providers in one place.